# Multi-Product Strategy I...  ## Metadata - Author: [[@ibscribe on Twitter]] - Full Title: Multi-Product Strategy I... - Category: #tweets - URL: https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501773700600795138 ## Highlights - Multi-product strategy is something I spend a lot of time thinking about, both for the day job and via my various side hustles. but it’s something where I’ve seen many PMs get into trouble a 🧵 about Add-On Features vs New Product Lines ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501773700600795138)) - one of the clearest articulations of how to think about additional products is this diagram from @reforge  ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501773863943770114)) - A couple of quick takeaways from the visual: •one key reason to add surface area to your product is to expand product-market fit (PMF) •the 3 ways to expand PMF are (a) same product, new market (b) new product, same market, or (c) some combination of (a) and (b) ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501774000485122048)) - I want to talk about (b) in this post (this is where I’ve seen PMs get into trouble) ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501774162276192257)) - The adjacent product circle is very ambiguous in my experience In short, product teams sometimes get lost on whether they are building just add-on features for the current offering or truly complementary but separate new product lines. ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501774359223955459)) - And it’s confusing because the outcomes you hope to drive (market penetration, category creation, customer mindshare) and the metrics you expect to move (revenue, retention, adoption) are the same with both types of product work. ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501774427649765381)) - To re-phrase the points above in a visual way… You have a core product loop:  ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501774532591292417)) - When you create add-on features, the intention is to improve one incremental step in the existing loop, and hopefully better complete and ultimately accelerate the loop  ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501774643538976772)) - But with a new product line, you’re actually creating a net-new loop that connects to your existing core product loop  ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501774771972763648)) - By the way, if you introduce new products that don’t conect at all to your core product, you’re building distinct but disjointed businesses, which is a post for another day. ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501774842948820996)) - So how do you know which state (add-on feature, new product) you’re actually in? some sniff test questions that I use… ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501774955465228289)) - 1/ Will pricing/packaging changes alone accomplish your intended shift? (if yes, smells like add-on) ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775021521268739)) - 2/ Would the product sell stand-alone irrespective of whether customers buy your core offering? (if yes, smells like new product) ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775069269291011)) - 3/ When churn / downsell happens, is it the entire product portfolio or do customer attempt to hang onto some pieces of functionality? ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775130107670529)) - 4/ Do the product capabilities drive user stickiness (add-on feature) or user growth (new product line)? (think of this as depth vs breadth) ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775212714487810)) - 5/ Can the core product team balance requests coherently or does it feel like being asked to make artificial trade-offs between 2 parallel priorities? (ideally new products are new teams vs asking core team to juggle) ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775268599320577)) - The point of this 🧵 is not to say that add-on features are less valuable than new product lines (or vice versa), but it’s important to know which mode you’re in so you can set-up your operating model accordingly. ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775360483942401)) - When you organize for one model and try to execute another, the org design will work against you. ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775484731858944)) - Lastly, you sometimes don’t know early on where you stand - for example, you start building an add-on feature for what you think is your core persona and learn along the way that it’s a new product line for an adjacent persona ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775537219391493)) - this is part of having a fluid point of view on the market and something seasoned PMs have to navigate. ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775589065191424)) - If you liked this 🧵, follow me @ibscribe (same handle on Instagram with more visual content) ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775756715692038)) - You can also subscribe to my free newsletter https://t.co/h397dBfFeF ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501775884180545538)) - And I’ll be teaching a cohort based course on this and some advanced topics in a few weeks sign up here 👉🏽 https://t.co/g2yOEaiVJl ([View Tweet](https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1501776204612857862))