# Describing SEQ® Scores With Adjectives  ## Metadata - Author: [[Jim Lewis, PhD and Jeff Sauro, PhD]] - Full Title: Describing SEQ® Scores With Adjectives - Category: #articles - Summary: After going through the process of crafting items, ensuring content validity, achieving adequate levels of reliability, and demonstrating concurrent validity, you’re still not done. - URL: https://measuringu.com/adjective-interpretations-of-SEQ-scores/ ## Highlights - Of these, one of the most popular methods is the [adjective scale](https://uxpajournal.org/determining-what-individual-sus-scores-mean-adding-an-adjective-rating-scale/), developed by Bangor et al. (2009), which has six levels—Worst Imaginable, Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent, and Best Imaginable. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01h55wqzbfa17ymd7ye2w8e6rk)) - This brings us to the [Single Ease Question](https://measuringu.com/evaluation-of-three-seq-variants/) (SEQ®), a widely used single item for measuring the perceived ease of task completion (Figure 1). [](https://measuringu.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Figure-1.png) ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01h55wrg33wp6gpfemwxqptjtc))